The Clinton health care plan included mandatory enrollment in a health insurance plan, subsidies to guarantee affordability across all income ranges, and the establishment of health alliances in each state.
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract The purpose of this research paper is to compare health care systems in three highly advanced industrialized countries: The first part of the research paper will focus on the description of health care systems in the above-mentioned countries while the second part will analyze, evaluate and compare the three systems regarding equity and efficiency.
Finally, an overview of recent changes and proposed future reforms in these countries will be provided as well. We start by providing a general description and comparison of the structure of health care systems in Canada, Germany and the United States.
Health insurance coverage is universal. General taxes finance NHI through a single payer system only one third-party payer is responsible for paying health care providers for medical services. Consumer co-payments are negligible and physician choice is unlimited.
Production of health care services is private; physicians receive payments on a negotiated fee for service and hospitals receive global budget payments Method used by third party payers to control medical care costs by establishing total expenditure limits for medical services over a specified period of time.
Most of the population lives within miles of the United States border. From the American point of view, Canada provides a good comparison and contrast in terms of the structure of its health care systems. The Canadian health care system began to take on its current form when the province of Saskatchewan set up a hospitalization plan immediately after WWII.
The rural, low—income province was plagued by shortages of both hospital beds and medical practitioners.
The main feature of this plan was the creation of the regional system of hospitals: Inthe federal parliament enacted the Hospital and Diagnostic Services Act laying the groundwork for a nationwide system of hospital insurance.
By all ten provinces and the two territories had hospital insurance plans of their own with the federal government paying one half of the costs. Since the health care system has moved in different directions. While Canada has had publicly funded national health insurance, the United States has relied largely on private financing and delivery.
During this period, spending in the United States has grown much more rapidly despite large groups that either uninsured or minimally insured. The provisions of the Canada Health Act define the health care delivery system as it currently operates.
Under the Act, each provincial health plan is administered at the provincial level and provides comprehensive first dollar coverage of all medically necessary services.
With minor exceptions, health coverage is available to all residents with no out of pocket charges. Most physicians are paid on a fee for service basis and enjoy a great deal of practice autonomy.
Private health insurance for covered services is illegal. Most Canadians have supplemental private insurance for uncovered services, such as prescription drugs and dental services. As a result, virtually all physicians are forced to participate and each health plan effectively serves all residents in the province Henderson All photos are courtesy of the U.S.
National Library of Medicine and/or the Department of Health and Human srmvision.com following sources were used in the development of the timeline content: U.S.
National Library of Medicine, srmvision.com and Fitzhugh Mullan, Plagues and Politics: The Story of the United States Public Health Service . Feb 12, · The purpose of this research paper is to compare health care systems in three highly advanced industrialized countries: The United States of America, Canada and Germany.
The United States' healthcare system is unique among Western countries. The United States has eschewed universal national insurance in favor of a private, employer-based system, with government programs covering only certain vulnerable groups. The health insurance system we have in place today — a mix of private and government payers — has been a century in the making.
The history of the United States is vast and complex, but can be broken down into moments and time periods that divided, unified, and changed the United States into the country it is today: The Library of Congress has compiled a list of historic events for each day of the year, titled "This Day in.
On pluralism in health politics, see, for example, Daniel Fox, “The Decline of Historicism: The Case of Compulsory Health Insurance in the United States,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 57 (): –